Contributed by Organizations or Campuses; Articles, Papers, and Reports; Faculty; and Scholarly Communication

Ithaka’s 2006 Studies of Key Stakeholders in the Digital Transformation in Higher Education

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:Ithaka’s 2006 Studies of Key Stakeholders in the Digital Transformation in Higher Education (ID: CSD5490)
Author(s):Ross Housewright (Ithaka) and Roger C. Schonfeld (Ithaka)
Origin:Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (08/18/2008)
Type:Articles, Papers, and Reports
Abstract:

Ithaka's 2006 survey of faculty members sought to determine their attitudes related to online resources, electronic archiving, teaching and learning and related subjects.  This study affords the opportunity to develop trend analysis of many measurements collected in the 2003 and 2000 faculty surveys. As in the past, Ithaka developed a robust set of disciplinary and other demographic analyses that have allowed them to learn more about how best to serve the needs of different types of faculty members. Findings include;

View this resource:

Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An In-depth Study of Faculty Needs and Ways of Meeting Them

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An In-depth Study of Faculty Needs and Ways of Meeting Them (ID: CSD5431)
Author(s):Diane Harley (University of California, Berkeley)
Source:Berkeley, Center for the Study of Higher Education at the University of California
Origin:Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (05/01/2008)
Type:Articles, Papers, and Reports
Abstract:

The Center for Studies in Higher Education, with generous funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, is conducting research to understand the needs and desires of faculty for in-progress scholarly communication (i.e., forms of communication employed as research is being executed) as well as archival publication. In the interest of developing a deeper understanding of how and why scholars do what they do to advance their fields, as well as their careers, our approach focuses on fine-grained analyses of faculty values and behaviors throughout the scholarly communication lifecycle, including sharing, collaborating, publishing, and engaging with the public. Well into our second year, we have posted a draft interim report describing some of our early results and impressions based on the responses of more than 150 interviewees in the fields of astrophysics, archaeology, biology, economics, history, music, and political science.

View this resource:

Faculty Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Scholarly Communication:Survey Findings from the University of California

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:Faculty Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Scholarly Communication:Survey Findings from the University of California (ID: CSD5162)
Source:University of California Office of Scholarly Communication
Origin:Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (08/30/2007)
Type:Articles, Papers, and Reports
Abstract:

This paper reports the results of over 1,100 responses to a late 2006 survey of UC faculty attitudes and behavior with regard to several key issues in scholarly publishing and scholarly communication. The report is timed to inform Universitywide discussions - many of them prompted by a series of faculty white papers - about strategic responses to challenges and opportunities in the evolution of scholarly publishing and communication. The survey also provides important insight into how the University's eScholarship publishing services (including those offered in partnership with the UC Press) can meet faculty needs.

View this resource:

Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University's Installation of DSpace

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University's Installation of DSpace (ID: CSD4922)
Author(s):Philip Davis (Cornell University) and Matthew J. Connolly (Cornell University)
Source:D-Lib Magazine
Origin:Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2007)
Type:Articles, Papers, and Reports
Abstract:This article reports on a three-part evaluative study of institutional repositories. We describe the contents and participation in Cornell's DSpace and compare these results with seven university DSpace installations. Through in-depth interviews with eleven faculty members in the sciences, social sciences and humanities, we explore their attitudes, motivations, and behaviors for non-participation in institutional repositories.
View this resource: