Contributed by Organizations or Campuses; Articles, Papers, and Reports; ISP; and Net Neutrality
Comcast Blockage of BitTorrent 101
| Title: | Comcast Blockage of BitTorrent 101 (ID: CSD5205) | | Source: | Free Press | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (10/23/2007) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | "According to an Oct. 19 article by the Associated Press, Comcast has been actively degrading and blocking BitTorrent traffic, amounting to "the most drastic example yet of data discrimination by a U.S. Internet service provider." This is the latest and most clear cut incident illustrating the need for "network neutrality" principles for the Internet. This factsheet provides a technological backgrounder on what Comcast is blocking and how the company does it." | | View this resource: | |
Deep packet inspection meets 'Net neutrality, CALEA
| Title: | Deep packet inspection meets 'Net neutrality, CALEA (ID: CSD5038) | | Author(s): | Nate Anderson (Ars Technica, LLC) | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (07/25/2007) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | "Imagine a device that sits inline in a major ISP's network and can throttle P2P traffic at differing levels depending on the time of day. Imagine a device that allows one user access only to e-mail and the Web while allowing a higher-paying user to use VoIP and BitTorrent. Imagine a device that protects against distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, scans for viruses passing across the network, and siphons off requested traffic for law enforcement analysis. Imagine all of this being done in real time, for 900,000 simultaneous users, and you get a sense of the power of deep packet inspection (DPI) network appliances. " | | View this resource: | |
Internet 3.0: Identifying Problems and Solutions to the Network Neutrality Debate
| Title: | Internet 3.0: Identifying Problems and Solutions to the Network Neutrality Debate (ID: CSD4899) | | Author(s): | Robert M. Frieden (The Pennsylvania State University) | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2006) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | This paper will examine the network neutrality debate with an eye toward refuting and dismissing the many false and misleading claims and concentrating on the real problems occasioned by the Internet's third evolution. The paper accepts as necessary and proper many types of price and quality of service discrimination. However the paper identifies other types of discrimination, which operators can obscure, that constitute unlawful and anticompetitive trade practices. The paper identifies best practices in lawful discrimination that should satisfy most network neutrality goals without creating disincentives that might dissuade ISPs from building the infrastructure needed for Internet 3.0 services. The paper concludes that legitimate concerns about unlawful network discrimination warrants the presence of a referee to remedy abuses before irreparable marketplace competitive harm occurs and well before a court of law could act. The paper recommends that the FCC require ISPs to submit network usage reports that the Commission could use to determine the causes of congestion and other types of service disruption. | | View this resource: | |
|