Contributed by Organizations or Campuses; Articles, Papers, and Reports; Copyright; and Electronic Publishing

Open Access in 2007

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:Open Access in 2007 (ID: CSD5409)
Author(s):Peter Suber (Public Knowledge)
Source:Journal of Electronic Publishing
Origin:Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (02/15/2008)
Type:Articles, Papers, and Reports
Abstract:

Peter Suber shares his annual review of the open access movement. The article highlights 15 categories of open access activity in 2007.

View this resource:

Faculty Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Scholarly Communication:Survey Findings from the University of California

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:Faculty Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Scholarly Communication:Survey Findings from the University of California (ID: CSD5162)
Source:University of California Office of Scholarly Communication
Origin:Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (08/30/2007)
Type:Articles, Papers, and Reports
Abstract:

This paper reports the results of over 1,100 responses to a late 2006 survey of UC faculty attitudes and behavior with regard to several key issues in scholarly publishing and scholarly communication. The report is timed to inform Universitywide discussions - many of them prompted by a series of faculty white papers - about strategic responses to challenges and opportunities in the evolution of scholarly publishing and communication. The survey also provides important insight into how the University's eScholarship publishing services (including those offered in partnership with the UC Press) can meet faculty needs.

View this resource:

Scholarship and Academic Libraries (and their kin) in the World of Google

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:Scholarship and Academic Libraries (and their kin) in the World of Google (ID: CSD4642)
Author(s):Paul N. Courant (University of Michigan-Ann Arbor)
Origin:Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2006)
Type:Articles, Papers, and Reports
Abstract:The prospect of ubiquitous digitization will not change the fundamental relationships among scholarship, academic libraries, and publication. Collaboration across time and space, which is a principal mechanism of scholarship, ought to be enhanced. Reforms in copyright law will be required if the promise of digitization is to be realized; absent such reform, there is a serious risk that much academically valuable material will become invisible and unused. Ubiquitous digitization will change radically the economics that have supported university–based collections of published material. Scholars and scholarly institutions (including libraries and university presses) must assert vigorously claims of fair use and openness.
View this resource:

Seizing the Moment - Scientists’ Authorship Rights in the Digital Age

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:Seizing the Moment - Scientists’ Authorship Rights in the Digital Age (ID: CSD3196)
Origin:Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2002)
Type:Articles, Papers, and Reports
Abstract:Report of a Study on authorship rights by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. As this report evolved, a consensus was reached on the central thrust of the study-that scientists should be more assertive in claiming their intellectual property rights and that they leverage those rights to increase access to and use of their works through more creative and expanded use of licensing. The basic terms of such an approach were generally agreed to, with participants expressing varying views on the details.
View this resource:

Scholarship, Instruction, and Libraries at the Turn of the Century

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:Scholarship, Instruction, and Libraries at the Turn of the Century (ID: CLR1007)
Origin:Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (1999)
Type:Articles, Papers, and Reports
Abstract:To understand how technology is changing the nature of scholarship and teaching, the American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) and the Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR) joined forces to establish five task forces that examined these questions by looking at the special requirements posed by different types of information resources. The deliberations of these task forces are detailed in this report. From the discussions, CLIR extracted all of the recommendations that were proposed by individual task force members. While some clear priorities emerged, the groups did not always attempt to reach consensus on the various recommendations nor to place them in priority order
View this resource: