Contributed by Organizations or Campuses; Articles, Papers, and Reports; and Learning
Learning 2.0
| Title: | Learning 2.0 (ID: CSD5231) | | Author(s): | Andrew Guess (Inside Higher Ed) | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (11/13/2007) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | "As online tools become more ubiquitous inside and outside the classroom, and the growth of distance learning continues, education researchers have begun to focus on how best to harness new technologies. Advocates for the classical lecture experience still exist, of course, but the general trend has been toward incorporating various technologies into the classroom, from course management software to digital photography. One approach, called “blended learning,” mixes traditional “face to face” techniques with cutting-edge developments in theory and technology." | | View this resource: | |
Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning
| Title: | Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning (ID: CSD5208) | | Author(s): | I. E. Allen (Babson College) and Jeff Seaman (Babson College) | | Source: | The Sloan Consortium | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (10/24/2007) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning represents the fifth annual report on the state of online learning in U.S. higher education. This year’s study, like those for the previous four years, is aimed at answering some of the fundamental questions about the nature and extent of online education. Supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and based on responses from more than 2,500 colleges and universities, the study addresses the following key questions: - How Many Students are Learning Online?
- Where has the Growth in Online Learning Occurred?
- Why do Institutions Provide Online Offerings?
- What are the Prospects for Future Online Enrollment Growth?
- What are the Barriers to Widespread Adoption of Online Education?
| | View this resource: | |
Faculty Integration of Technology into Instruction and Students' Perceptions of Computer Technology to Improve Student Learning
| Title: | Faculty Integration of Technology into Instruction and Students' Perceptions of Computer Technology to Improve Student Learning (ID: CSD5189) | | Author(s): | Jared Keengwe (University of North Dakota) | | Source: | Journal of Information Technology Education | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (10/11/2007) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | There has been a remarkable improvement in access and rate of adoption of technology in higher education. Even so, reports indicate that faculty members are not integrating technology into instruction in ways that make a difference in student learning (Cuban, 2001; McCannon & Crews, 2000). To help faculty make informed decisions on student learning, there is need for current knowledge of faculty integration practices. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the nature of the relationship between faculty integration of technology into classroom instruction and students' perceptions of the effect of computer technology to improve their learning. A sample of at least 800 undergraduate students at a participating medium-sized midwest public university was selected using a stratified random sampling technique. The researcher delivered and administered the surveys to the participating students and collected them after completion. 98% of the questionnaires were complete and retained for analysis. Two major statistical techniques | | View this resource: | |
New ‘Threads’ for Computer Science
| Title: | New ‘Threads’ for Computer Science (ID: CSD4673) | | Author(s): | Scott Jaschik | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2006) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | Responding to the large-scale exodus of students from computer science programs nationwide, the Georgia Institute of Technology is undertaking a fundamental redesign of the curriculum for computer science majors.The new approach replaces the core curriculum with courses that follow "threads" and "roles." Students choose two of eight threads of instruction and tailor their schedules around those concepts. Threads include computational modeling, intelligence, and so on. Many of the courses that compose a student's threads might be taught by faculty outside the computer science department. For the role part of the curriculum, students choose either programmer, entrepreneur, innovator, or communicator, which guides selection of other courses. The hoped-for result is a curriculum that provides the flexibility and breadth that students need to compete in the changing high-tech landscape. Richard DeMillo, dean of the College of Computing, noted that confidence in the job market for computer science graduates is flagging, saying that he spends considerable amount of time talking to parents about their children's prospects. He believes the new curriculum will help allay their concerns. | | View this resource: | |
|