Contributed by Organizations or Campuses; Articles, Papers, and Reports; and Library Standards
On the Record: Report of The Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control
| Title: | On the Record: Report of The Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control (ID: CSD5308) | | Source: | Library of Congress | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (01/09/2008) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | This is the final report from The Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control. The Report is based on the key premise that the community is at a critical juncture in the evolution of bibliographic control and information access/provision. It is time to take stock of past practices, to look at today's trends, and to project a future path consistent with the goals of bibliographic control: to facilitate discovery, management, identification, and access of and to library materials and other information products. Libraries must work in the most efficient and cooperative manner to minimize where possible the costs of bibliographic control, but both the Library of Congress and library administrators generally must recognize that they need to identify and allocate (or, as appropriate, reallocate) sufficient funding if they are serious about attaining the goals of improved and expanded bibliographic control. | | View this resource: | |
Metadata for All: Descriptive Standards and Metadata Sharing across Libraries, Archives and Museums
| Title: | Metadata for All: Descriptive Standards and Metadata Sharing across Libraries, Archives and Museums (ID: CSD4923) | | Author(s): | Mary W. Elings (University of California, Berkeley) and Guenter Waibel (RLG, Inc.) | | Source: | First Monday | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2007) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | Integrating digital content from libraries, archives and museums represents a persistent challenge. While the history of standards development is rife with examples of cross-community experimentation, in the end, libraries, archives and museums have developed parallel descriptive strategies for cataloguing the materials in their custody. Applying in particular data content standards by material type, and not by community affiliation, could lead to greater data interoperability within the cultural heritage community. In making this argument, the article demystifies metadata by defining and categorizing types of standards, provides a brief historical overview of the rise of descriptive standards in museums, libraries and archives, and considers the current tensions and ambitions in making descriptive practice more economic [1]. | | View this resource: | |
Contexts and Contributions: Building the Distributed Library
| Title: | Contexts and Contributions: Building the Distributed Library (ID: CSD4754) | | Author(s): | Martha Brogan (University of Pennsylvania) | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2006) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | Martha L. Brogan's Contexts and Contributions: Building the Distributed Library is a major contribution to the Digital Library Federation's (DLF) suite of work that focuses on the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH). With generous funding from the Institute of Museum and Library Services, DLF has harnessed deep OAI expertise from the University of Michigan, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and Emory University to prototype "next-generation" OAI services informed by advisory panels of scholars and technical experts; to build registries of providers to aid in the creation of new OAI-based services; and to formulate best practices for sharable metadata that focus what we have learned collectively for innovative library services. The best practices work has received intellectual and practical support from our colleagues at the National Science Digital Library (NSDL), a service of the National Science Foundation (NSF). | | View this resource: | |
Moving Towards Shareable Metadata
| Title: | Moving Towards Shareable Metadata (ID: CSD41643) | | Author(s): | Sarah Shreeves (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2006) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | A focus of digital libraries, particularly since the advent of the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting, is aggregating from multiple collections metadata describing digital content. However, the quality and interoperability of the metadata often prevents such aggregations from offering much more than very simple search and discovery services. Shareable metadata is metadata which can be understood and used outside of its local environment by aggregators to provide more advanced services. This paper describes shareable metadata, its characteristics, and its importance to digital library development, as well as barriers and challenges to its implementation. | | View this resource: | |
Metasearch Authentication and Access Management
| Title: | Metasearch Authentication and Access Management (ID: CSD4474) | | Author(s): | Michael Teets (OCLC, Inc.) and Peter E. Murray (Wright State University) | | Source: | D-Lib Magazine | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2006) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | "Metasearch – also called parallel search, federated search, broadcast search, and cross-database search – has become commonplace in the information community's vocabulary. All speak to a common theme of searching and retrieving from multiple databases, sources, platforms, protocols, and vendors at the point of the user's request. Metasearch services rely on a variety of approaches including open standards (such as NISO's Z39.50 and SRU/SRW), proprietary programming interfaces, and "screen scraping." However, the absence of widely supported standards, best practices, and tools makes the metasearch environment less efficient for the metasearch provider, the content provider, and ultimately the end-user." | | View this resource: | |
Guidelines for Distance Learning Library Services
| Title: | Guidelines for Distance Learning Library Services (ID: CSD4502) | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2000) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | Library resources and services in institutions of higher education must meet the needs of all their faculty, students, and academic support personnel, regardless of where they are located. This is the undergirding and uncompromising conviction of the "Guidelines for Distance Learning Library Services." The principle applies to individuals on a main campus, off campus, in distance learning or regional campus programs, or in the absence of a campus at all. | | View this resource: | |
A Standards-based Solution for the Accurate Transfer of Digital Assets
| Title: | A Standards-based Solution for the Accurate Transfer of Digital Assets (ID: CSD4064) | | Author(s): | Jeroen Bekaert (Los Alamos National Laboratory) and Herbert van de Sompel (Los Alamos National Laboratory) | | Source: | D-Lib Magazine | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2005) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | This article describes results of a collaboration between the Research Library of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) and the American Physical Society (APS) aimed at designing and implementing a robust solution for the recurrent transfer of digital assets from the APS collection to LANL. In this solution, various recent standards are combined to obtain an asset transfer framework that should be attractive as a means to optimize content transfer in environments beyond the specific APS/LANL project. The proposed solution uses an XML-based complex object format (the MPEG-21 Digital Item Declaration Language) for the application-neutral representation of compound digital assets of all sorts. It uses a pull-oriented HTTP-based protocol (the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting) that allows incrementally collecting new and updated assets, represented as XML documents, from a producing archive. It builds on an XML-specific technique (W3C XML Signatures) to provide guarantees regarding authenticity and accuracy of the transferred assets. | | View this resource: | |
|