Contributed by Organizations or Campuses; Articles, Papers, and Reports; and Piracy
Downloading by Students Overstated
| Title: | Downloading by Students Overstated (ID: CSD5321) | | Author(s): | Andrew Guess (Inside Higher Ed) | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (01/23/2008) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | "In its campaign urging lawmakers and colleges to take the issue of on-campus illegal file sharing seriously, the Motion Picture Association of America has wielded an array of legal arguments, facts and statistics. It now appears that a central figure in that arsenal was high by a factor of three, galvanizing its opponents who maintain that colleges have been singled out unfairly as havens of downloading activity. " | | View this resource: | |
MPAA Admits Mistake on Downloading Study
| Title: | MPAA Admits Mistake on Downloading Study (ID: CSD5322) | | Author(s): | Justin Pope (Associated Press) | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (01/22/2008) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | "In a 2005 study it commissioned, the Motion Picture Association of America claimed that 44 percent of the industry's domestic losses came from illegal downloading of movies by college students, who often have access to high-bandwidth networks on campus. The MPAA has used the study to pressure colleges to take tougher steps to prevent illegal file-sharing and to back legislation currently before the House of Representatives that would force them to do so. But now the MPAA, which represents the U.S. motion picture industry, has told education groups a "human error" in that survey caused it to get the number wrong. It now blames college students for about 15 percent of revenue loss." | | View this resource: | |
Recut, Reframe, Recycle: Quoting Copyrighted Material in User-Generated Video
| Title: | Recut, Reframe, Recycle: Quoting Copyrighted Material in User-Generated Video (ID: CSD5306) | | Author(s): | Patricia Aufderheide (American University) and Peter Jaszi (American University) | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (01/04/2008) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | As online video burgeons, so do questions about what kinds of uses of copyrighted works are legal online. Inevitably, those questions will be settled at least as much by practice and private negotiation as by legal action. Recent discussions of filtering and monitoring practices for platform providers show the importance of identifying lawful uses, while meeting industry concern to limit unauthorized use of copyrighted material. This study showcases user practices in use of copyrighted works within their own online videos at the dawn of this process. It identifies nine common kinds of re-appropriation practices, including satire and parody, criticism, and video diaries. It shows that a substantial amount of user-generated video uses copyrighted material in ways that are eligible for fair use consideration, although no coordinated work has yet been done to understand such practices through the fair use lens. Thus, a significant set of creative practices is potentially both legal and at risk of curtailment by currently discussed ways to control online piracy and theft of copyrighted works. | | View this resource: | |
|