Documents Contributed by ECAR, Advanced Networking, and Standards
Advanced Networking Services: Current Issues in Higher Education
| Title: | Advanced Networking Services: Current Issues in Higher Education (ID: ERB0809) | | Author(s): | John W. McCredie (University of California, Berkeley) | | Origin: | Documents Contributed by ECAR, Research Bulletins (04/29/2008) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | This research bulletin explores the advanced networking issues and investments that colleges and universities that aspire to support their faculty and students in leading edge research and education activities must face in the near future. It is drawn from the work of the Advanced Networking Services Work Group at the University of California, which was charged with evaluating the current state of UC’s networking infrastructure, identifying best practices in global networking activities, and making recommendations to position UC for competitive advantage. The author served as chair of the Work Group. Citation for this work: McCredie, Jack. “Advanced Network Services: Current Issues in Higher Education” (Research Bulletin, Issue 9). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, 2008, available from http://www.educause.edu/ecar. | | View this resource: | This publication is currently password protected. All faculty, staff, and students from institutions that have subscribed to ECAR at the ECAR Participating, Comprehensive Content, Corporate, and Research Bulletins Package levels are authorized to access this publication by using their EDUCAUSE personal profile. |
IT Governance: Solid Structures and Practical Politics
| Title: | IT Governance: Solid Structures and Practical Politics (ID: ECR0711) | | Author(s): | Ronald Yanosky (EDUCAUSE) and John W. McCredie (University of California, Berkeley) | | Origin: | Documents Contributed by ECAR, Presentations (12/06/2007) | | Type: | Presentations/Speeches | | Abstract: | Presentation at the Sixth Annual ECAR Symposium, December 5-7, 2007, in Boca Raton, Florida. Higher education IT organizations have become increasingly aware of the need for governance processes that sit above day-to-day management and address strategic alignment and the political realities of satisfying IT's many constituencies. But how should -and do- higher education institutions govern IT? This presentation uses the results of an ECAR study of IT governance to frame an interactive session on how to mix good structural governance practices with practical politics. How to Cite This Work: Yanosky, Ronald, and John W. McCredie. "IT Governance: Solid Structures and Practical Politics." Presentation at the ECAR Symposium, Boca Raton, FL, December 5-7, 2007, available from http://www.educause.edu/ecar.
| | View this resource: | |
Improving IT Governance in Higher Education
| Title: | Improving IT Governance in Higher Education (ID: ERB0618) | | Author(s): | John W. McCredie (University of California, Berkeley) | | Origin: | Documents Contributed by ECAR, Research Bulletins (08/29/2006) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | This research bulletin examines the ways many research universities govern their IT activities, explores some inherent problems in these processes, identifies several good practices, and suggests changes that may improve the current state of the art. It draws on research conducted by MIT and ECAR on IT alignment and governance; information submitted to the EDUCAUSE Core Data Service survey; the results of an extensive review of IT governance at the University of California, Berkeley; a one-day governance workshop hosted by the Common Solutions Group; the work of a project team participating in the IT Leaders Project; and the observations and results of several external review committees on which the author has served. | | View this resource: | |
Information Technology Networking in Higher Education: Campus Commodity and Competitive Differentiator Roadmap
| Title: | Information Technology Networking in Higher Education: Campus Commodity and Competitive Differentiator Roadmap (ID: ECM0502) | | Author(s): | Judith A. Pirani (EDUCAUSE) and Gail Salaway (EDUCAUSE) | | Origin: | Documents Contributed by ECAR, Roadmaps (02/07/2005) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | This ECAR roadmap is designed to illuminate a host of current network management practices related to IT in higher education; opportunities for connectivity to external networks; the institutional context of organization, leadership and management; current emerging technologies and converged networks; and the future of networking. The roadmap is based on five major research initiatives: a literature review, consultation with the EDUCAUSE Net@EDU Integrated Communications Solutions Working Group, survey responses from 517 chief information officers and network directors in higher education, qualitative interviews with 12 higher education leaders about their view of the future of IT networking in higher education, and three in-depth cases studies involving four U.S. institutions and SURF, a Dutch higher education and research partnership. | | View this resource: | |
Information Technology Networking in Higher Education: Campus Commodity and Competitive Differentiator
| Title: | Information Technology Networking in Higher Education: Campus Commodity and Competitive Differentiator (ID: EKF0502) | | Author(s): | Judith A. Pirani (EDUCAUSE), Gail Salaway (EDUCAUSE), Richard N. Katz (EDUCAUSE), and John Voloudakis (Huron Consulting Group) | | Origin: | Documents Contributed by ECAR, Key Findings (02/07/2005) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | This ECAR research study is designed to illuminate a host of current network management practices related to IT in higher education; opportunities for connectivity to external networks; the institutional context of organization, leadership and management; current emerging technologies and converged networks; and the future of networking. The study is based on five major research initiatives: a literature review, consultation with the EDUCAUSE Net@EDU Integrated Communications Solutions Working Group, survey responses from 517 chief information officers and network directors in higher education, qualitative interviews with 12 higher education leaders about their view of the future of IT networking in higher education, and three in-depth cases studies involving four U.S. institutions and SURF, a Dutch higher education and research partnership. | | View this resource: | |
|