Open Source; Contributed by Organizations or Campuses; and Articles, Papers, and Reports
Free and Open Source Options for Creating Database-Driven Subject Guides
| Title: | Free and Open Source Options for Creating Database-Driven Subject Guides (ID: CSD5388) | | Author(s): | Edward M. Corrado (Binghamton University) and Kathryn A. Frederick (Elmira College) | | Source: | The Code4Lib Journal | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (03/28/2008) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | This article reviews available cost-effective options libraries have for updating and maintaining pathfinders such as subject guides and course pages. The paper discusses many of the available options, from the standpoint of a mid-sized academic library which is evaluating alternatives to static-HTML subject guides. Static HTML guides, while useful, have proven difficult and time-consuming to maintain. The article includes a discussion of open source database-driven solutions (such as SubjectsPlus, LibData, Research Guide, and Library Course Builder), Wikis, and social tagging sites like del.icio.us. This article discusses both the functionality and the relative strengths and weaknessess of each of these options. | | View this resource: | |
Intellectual Property and Cyberinfrastructure
| Title: | Intellectual Property and Cyberinfrastructure (ID: CSD5055) | | Author(s): | Dan L. Burk (Seton Hall University School of Law) | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (06/15/2007) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | The development of a new generation of cyberinfrastructure promises to increase and facilitate globally distributed scientific collaboration as well as access to scientific research via computer networks. But the potential for such access and collaboration is subject to concerns regarding the intellectual property rights that will be associated with networked data and with networked collaborative activity. Intellectual property regimes are generally problematic in the practice of science, because scientific research typically assumes practices of openness that may be hampered or obstructed by intellectual property rights. These difficulties are likely to be exacerbated in the context of networked collaboration, where the development and use of intellectual resources will likely be distributed among many researchers in a variety of physical locations, often spanning national boundaries. Such issues may be addressed by a combination of public and private approaches, including amendment of U.S. | | View this resource: | |
Open Education 2006: Community, Culture, and Content
| Title: | Open Education 2006: Community, Culture, and Content (ID: CSD4683) | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2006) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | Open Education 2006: Community, Culture, and Content was a multidisciplinary event designed to promote the discussion of the variety of research, development, and other activities necessary to move the field of open education forward. The proceedings include over 30 papers on topics such as Open educational resources, Tools and software supporting open education and Reusing and remixing open educational resources. | | View this resource: | |
Analysis of Open Source Principles in Diverse Collaborative Communities
| Title: | Analysis of Open Source Principles in Diverse Collaborative Communities (ID: CSD4646) | | Author(s): | Jill Coffin | | Source: | First Monday | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2006) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | Open source culture and practice emerged as software hackers took control over the production, ownership and distribution of their skilled work. This revolution, quiet and unnoticed by most, began over twenty years ago. Along the way, free and open source software hackers developed organizational and dialog structures to support their ethos, creating a successful model for collaboration. This paper applies traits common to successful free software and open source hacker communities as a framework to analyze three non–hacker collaborative communities. | | View this resource: | |
|