Privacy and Federal Privacy Law

Recent resources tagged with Privacy and Federal Privacy Law.

When the ISP Tracks Your Every Move: The Power (and Abuse) of Deep Packet Inspection

Created by Anna M. Gould (EDUCAUSE) on July 18, 2008

As the temperatures rise in a typical Washington summer, so grows the pressure on some online advertising firms. 

Yesterday the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Telecommunications and the Internet Subcommittee held a hearing on the questionable methods for advertising currently being used by some Internet service providers (ISPs).  The hearing was entitled, “What Your Broadband Provider Knows About Your Web Use: Deep Packet Inspection and Communications Laws and Policies.”   Panelists included: Bob Dykes, the CEO for NebuAd, David Reed, an early Internet pioneer and professor at MIT, Alissa Cooper, the Chief Computer Scientist for the Center for Democracy and Technology, Scott Cleland, President of Precursor, LLC, and Bijan Sabet, a General Partner at Spark Capital. 

Are Online Targeted Advertising Practices Violating Wiretap Laws?

Created by Anna M. Gould (EDUCAUSE) on July 10, 2008

Released one day before the Senate Commerce Committee held its hearing on the privacy implications of online advertising, a new report says targeted ads may involve practices that violate state and federal wiretap laws.

On Tuesday, the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) issued a memo, saying Internet service providers (ISPs) that allow an advertising network to copy [their] customers' Web traffic contents are defying "reasonable consumer expectations and may [be violating] communications privacy laws."

Currently, some ISPs are working with third party advertising agencies, which are copying consumer data in order to target specific ads at users. One such firm, NebuAD, testifed before the Senate Commerce Committee yesterday. NebuAd claims it does not violate any laws because they do not collect personally identifiable information. Some, though, argue that any collection of data can ultimately be tied to an individual and disagree with NebuAd's assertion that privacy is completely protected. CDT's memo says the practice most likely violates legal protections provided in the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.

Insights on the Legal Landscape for Data Privacy in Higher Education

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:Insights on the Legal Landscape for Data Privacy in Higher Education (ID: CSD5362)
Author(s):Rodney J. Petersen (EDUCAUSE)
Origin:Contributed by the EDUCAUSE Policy Office (02/29/2008)
Type:Presentations/Speeches
Abstract:

This opening address was presented at the University System of Maryland's Workshop on Data Privacy for Maryland Higher Education.

View this resource:

The Privacy Landscape in the Academy

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:The Privacy Landscape in the Academy (ID: MAC08012)
Author(s):Lauren Steinfeld (University of Pennsylvania)
Origin:Presented at Mid-Atlantic Regional Conferences (01/15/2008)
Type:Presentations/Speeches
Abstract:

Privacy is a concept established by law and often embraced as part of institutional policies, academic values, or professional practice. Innovations in information technologies and changing cultural norms present new privacy challenges and opportunities for academic organizations. This session will highlight the privacy issues that confront higher education IT professionals and offer a path for moving forward.

View this resource:

The Internet at Risk: The Need for Higher Education Advocacy

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:The Internet at Risk: The Need for Higher Education Advocacy (ID: ERM0763)
Author(s):James X. Dempsey (Center for Democracy and Technology)
Origin:EDUCAUSE Review Articles (10/19/2007)
Type:Articles, Papers, and Reports
Abstract:

The higher education community, which has hosted many of the creators of the Internet and which has woven this technology into every aspect of education, now has a responsibility to work to defend an Internet policy framework based on user control, innovation, trust, and openness/competition.

View this resource:

FERPA Allows More Than You May Realize

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:FERPA Allows More Than You May Realize (ID: CSD5035)
Author(s):Nancy E. Tribbensee (Arizona State University) and Steven J. McDonald (Rhode Island School of Design)
Origin:Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (08/07/2007)
Type:Articles, Papers, and Reports
Abstract:

"Recent campus incidents have highlighted the importance of effective communication among administrators, faculty, and staff, as well as between campus representatives and students, families, and surrounding communities. Some commentators have argued that these incidents prove the need to amend the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, the federal statute known as FERPA that protects student privacy, in order to permit greater disclosure of information about troubled students. Actually, the current law works well, but colleges and universities need to better understand what that law really provides — and each institution needs to develop an internal consensus on how to approach the policy choices FERPA allows it to make. "

View this resource:

Identity Crisis: How Identification Is Overused and Misunderstood

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title:Identity Crisis: How Identification Is Overused and Misunderstood (ID: POL07009)
Author(s):Jim Harper (The Cato Institute)
Origin:Presented at Policy Conferences (06/12/2007)
Type:Presentations/Speeches
Abstract:

The advance of identification technology—biometrics, identity cards, surveillance, databases, dossiers—threatens privacy, civil liberties, and related human interests. In the wake of the terrorist attacks of 9/11 demands for identification in the name of security have increased. A national identification card, created by Congress in the REAL ID Act, is an example of a poor way to secure the country or its citizens. Instead of a uniform, government-controlled identification system, we need a competitive, responsive identification and credentialing industry that meets the mix of consumer demands for privacy, security, anonymity, and accountability. This session will explore the policy issues associated with identity and the implications for colleges and universities.

View this resource:

Warshak v. USA

Added by the EDUCAUSE Librarian
Title: Warshak v. USA (ID: CSD4992)
Source:US Dept of Justice
Origin:Contributed by the EDUCAUSE Policy Office (06/26/2007)
Type:Government Documents, Laws, Testimonies or Reports
Abstract:

A three-judge panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has held unanimously that the Fourth Amendment applies to e-mail. When it comes to government searches, e-mail is analogous to a sealed envelope. As a result of the case, Warshak v. USA, certain laws allowing warrantless access to e-mail, such as the Stored Communications Act and various provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act, are unconstitutional, at least within the jurisdiction of the 6th Circuit Court (Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee). The court pointedly recognized the evolving role of e-mail: "It goes without saying that like the telephone earlier in our history, e-mail is an ever-increasing mode of private communication, and protecting shared communications through this medium is as important to Fourth Amendment principles today as protecting telephone conversations has been in past."

View this resource:

Podcast:: Security Breaches and Identity Theft

Created by Gerry Bayne (EDUCAUSE) on June 26, 2007

In this 55 minute podcast, we present a general session from the EDUCAUSE 2007 Policy Conference entitled, “Security Breaches and Identity Theft”. This is a panel discussion moderated by EDUCAUSE Government Relations Officer and Security Task Force Coordinator, Rodney Peterson. The discussion features: 

Michael Atleson, Attorney, Division of Privacy and Identity Protection, Federal Trade Commission

Liz Gasster, General Counsel and Acting Executive Director of the Cyber Security Industry Alliance

Balancing “Safety” with “Freedom” in Aftermath of Virginia Tech Tragedy

Created by Rodney J. Petersen (EDUCAUSE) on June 19, 2007

In response to the tragic shootings at Virginia Tech, President George W. Bush directed the secretaries of the Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Education along with the Attorney General to meet with educators, mental health experts, law enforcement and state and local officials to discus the broader issues raised by this tragedy.  In their “Report to the President,” they conclude, “The Virginia Tech tragedy and similar violent events that have occurred in recent years . . . make us ask whether the complex balancing of fundamental interest in our communities – interests of protecting privacy and civil liberties, ensuring that our communities are safe, and helping people get the care they need – is appropriately calibrated.”  The report contained several recommendations relevant to emergency planning, preparedness, and notifications: