Intellectual Property and P2P File Sharing
Don't Download This Panel
| Title: | Don't Download This Panel (ID: WRC08029) | | Author(s): | Greg DePriest (NBC Universal), Kenneth C. Green (The Campus Computing Project), and Fred von Lohmann (Electronic Frontier Foundation) | | Origin: | Presented at Western Regional conferences (03/31/2008) | | Type: | Presentations/Speeches | | Abstract: | The attention of—and on—higher education has been focused on defensive measures to curb illegal file sharing. But this is occurring in the context of a much larger national debate about the appropriate role of copyright and intellectual property in cyberspace. Simultaneously, myriad new business models and delivery options for online digital entertainment are being tested. Ê What are institutions of higher education doing to curb illegal file sharing? What are the issues in the larger copyright debate? And what is the vision of the entertainment industry for offering digital entertainment online? A panel of distinguished experts in the field will discuss these and other pertinent issues in the peer-to-peer file sharing debate. | | View this resource: | |
Get Me Out of the Middle!
| Title: | Get Me Out of the Middle! (ID: ERM0829) | | Author(s): | Kent Wada (UCLA) | | Origin: | EDUCAUSE Review Articles | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | "File sharing serves as a tuning fork for an entirely new orchestra of digital communication, interaction, and social expectation. We in higher education must provide a clear, calm, ringing voice in defining the terms of the new world when we believe our goals and values are important not only to us but to society." | | View this resource: | |
Update on Key U.S. Copyright Developments
| Title: | Update on Key U.S. Copyright Developments (ID: LIVE084) | | Author(s): | James G. Neal (Columbia University) | | Origin: | EDUCAUSE Live!, Web Seminars Contributed by EDUCAUSE (02/29/2008) | | Type: | Presentations/Speeches | | Abstract: | Copyright continues to be a core interest of the higher education and academic library communities. This briefing will focus on eight critical legislative and legal arenas where the United States will be working on copyright: orphan works, digital fair use, broadcast flag, Section 1201 anti-circumvention rulemaking, electronic reserves, peer-to-peer file sharing, open access to government-funded research, and the report of the Section 108 Study Group on exceptions and limitations for libraries and archives. The work of the study group will be highlighted, including its primary findings and recommendations. In addition, two important recent studies will be described and their importance for libraries will be cited. The advocacy and educational roles and responsibilities of librarians on copyright also will be outlined. | | View this resource: | |
Copyright and Digital Media in a Post-Napster World: 2005 Update
| Title: | Copyright and Digital Media in a Post-Napster World: 2005 Update (ID: CSD3733) | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2005) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | The objective of this White Paper, initially released in August 2003 and updated in January 2005, is to provide a foundation for evaluating key questions facing the different stakeholders in the contentious debate over the future of digital media. It explores issues surrounding the current digital media ecosystem, including: * The legal and regulatory developments regarding copyright and related intellectual property issues. * Business models upset or enabled by digital media distribution. * Technological developments driving change across the value chain. * Shifts in consumer attitudes and behavior. Focusing on these topics, the Berkman Center's Digital Media Team identifies five scenarios that flow from developments in law, technology and society. The five scenarios are outlined at the end of the White Paper. They have provided an analytical structure for a series of conferences and recently published papers as well as research in progress. | | View this resource: | |
A copyright cold war? The polarized rhetoric of the peer-to-peer debates
| Title: | A copyright cold war? The polarized rhetoric of the peer-to-peer debates (ID: CSD2986) | | Origin: | Contributed by Organizations or Campuses (2003) | | Type: | Articles, Papers, and Reports | | Abstract: | Participants in the United States' ongoing debates over peer-to-peer transfers of potentially copyrighted files have regularly trafficked in the rhetoric of warfare. While it is easy to understand how copyright holders would view peer-to-peer file transfers as a kind of attack, the rhetorical turn toward the discourse of military conflict has radiated throughout the debate. Individuals from across the spectrum of opinions on peer-to-peer file transfers both accept and reproduce the positioning of this public policy debate as a life-or-death struggle. The weaknesses of this comparison are illustrated through reference to the history of the Cold War, often cited as a model for the post-Napster period. Further, the relative immaturity of the peer-to-peer debate is demonstrated through reference to rhetorical analysis techniques suggested by stasis theory. This article concludes by suggesting ways in which the currently stalemated debate might be revitalized by principled interventions from scholars and concerned citizens. | | View this resource: | |
|