Learning Space Design Theory and Practice

Malcolm Brown

Malcolm Brown is Director of Academic Computing at Dartmouth College. Comments on this article can be sent to the author at Malcolm.B.Brown@Dartmouth.edu.

Perhaps for as long as academicians have been conducting research, a challenge has been how to take the harvest from research and apply it in practice. This bridging (or perhaps mapping) of learning theory to practice is still the key for any department or institution that is striving to design or redesign its learning spaces. The first two articles in this issue of EDUCAUSE Review clearly make this point. It is vital to give coherence and consistency to the design of learning spaces by balancing learning theory, faculty and student culture, institutional goals, and resources, all in the face of a rapidly changing digital environment.

The table below is an attempt to map from the Net Generation’s characteristics to learning theory, and then from theory to learning space applications and the technology that might support those applications. Like any other document that points to specific technologies, it has a short shelf life. But the table calls attention to the need to have learning space design informed by a number of factors; and it thus provides a point of departure for campus design teams embarking on the task of facilitating current and future teaching and learning activities. Experience has shown that it is perilous to try to move directly from research to practice. Only when cultural, social, and institutional factors are considered can opportunities and possibilities emerge for the design of learning spaces, formal and informal, that work for both students and faculty.

Net Gen Trait

Learning Theory Principles

Learning Space Application

IT Application

Group activity oriented

Collaborative, cooperative, supportive

Small-group work spaces

IM chat; virtual whiteboards; screen sharing

Goal and achievement oriented

Metacognition; formative assessment

Access to tutors, consultants, and faculty in the learning space

Online formative quizzes; e-portfolios

Multitaskers

Active

Table space for a variety of tools

Wireless

Experimental; trial-and-error learners

Multiple learning paths

Integrated lab facilities

Applications for analysis and research

Heavily reliant on network access

Multiple learning resources

IT highly integrated into all aspects of learning spaces

IT infrastructure that fully supports learning space functions

Pragmatic and inductive

Encouraging of discovery

Availability of labs, equipment, and access to primary resources

Availability of analysis and presentation applications

Ethnically diverse

Engagement of preconceptions

Accessible facilities

Accessible online resources

Visual

Environmental factors; importance of culture and group aspects of learners

Shared screens (either projector or LCD); availability of printing

Image databases; media editing programs

Interactive

Compelling and challenging material

Workgroup facilitation; access to experts

Variety of resources; no "one size fits all"

Adapted from Table 2 in Malcolm Brown, "Learning Spaces," chapter 12 of Educating the Net Generation, ed. Diana G. Oblinger and James L. Oblinger (Boulder, Colo.: EDUCAUSE, 2005), e-book, available at http://www.educause.edu/LearningSpaces/6072.

Bookmark/Search this page with: