- faculty learning communities tied to the mission of the university
- alternative modes for outreach (underground movements)
- food, alcohol
- brown bags, enticing by doing short tech intros over the period of lunch
- require fac to submit proposals for summer development projects
- core literacies for technology
- faculty come to the table when tech solves a problem, so how do we create those problem spaces
- what you call it matters, 'workshop' is a dirty word, call it 'faculty prep'
- developing online learning communities to compliment faculty learning communities
- engage librarians in faculty development
- need to build long term trust relationships with faculty before they will engage in the risk-taking of exploring new methodologies
- Theme-based events to create ambience at workshops (e.g. Indy 500)
- getting faculty to present their work to other faculty, getting them to talk to each other about what they do
- helping faculty to understand where to go for what kind of help
- Digital Fellows, recognized by the institution - oooooh, I like this!
- talk w/faculty about how tech tools can also fit into their research or other publications/presentation (faculty seem to value most recognition by others in their disciplines)
- Incentive to faculty: learning more about tech will help you give good academic presentations
- Poster sessions at the end of a faculty development cohort completes it's work
Faculty/Staff Cultural Divide
- focusing on tech innovations within a particular field
- specialize as staff in a certain dept or area of research
- presenting ourselves as a support service is contributing to the divide, use different language
- open up partnership to others, grad students or TAs
- Teaching a class makes a difference, makes you 'one of them'
Media Fluencies:
- If teachers are not media/information fluent, who will teach the students to be?
- Does tech fluency requirements need to differ by discipline?
Unworkshops:
- help teachers help students learn
- 5 minute starters/teasers in existing faculty meeting
(side thought: what do we really know about the tenure review process? Do we need to really understand it so that we can help faculty do their research/publishing, therefore influence their teaching?)