Online Teaching Strategies, Presented at ELI Meetings
Meaningful Math, Relevant Science: Engaging Adult, Online Learners in Problem-Based Learning
| Title: | Meaningful Math, Relevant Science: Engaging Adult, Online Learners in Problem-Based Learning (ID: ELI07120) | | Author(s): | Evelyn Kay Ting (Empire State College SUNY) and Kent Stanton (Empire State College SUNY) | | Origin: | Presented at ELI Meetings (01/23/2007) | | Type: | Presentations/Speeches | | Abstract: | We have a national need to enhance the quantitative, scientific, and technological literacy of adult learners, including teachers. Using empirical research and theory-based design, we are addressing the challenge by creating an engaging, rich, and varied problem-based online math and science curriculum infused with case studies and virtual laboratory experiences. | | View this resource: | |
Engaging Mainstream Faculty in Designs for Online Learning Tasks
| Title: | Engaging Mainstream Faculty in Designs for Online Learning Tasks (ID: NLI0340) | | Author(s): | Tom Carey (University of Waterloo) | | Origin: | Presented at ELI Meetings (2003) | | Type: | Presentations/Speeches | | Abstract: | This session describes how the University of Waterloo has engaged mainstream faculty in rethinking their designs for learning as part of the development of online learning resources. There are three inter-related components in our approach: - An instructional design model which incorporates the availability of re-usable learning objects, while emphasizing faculty 'ownership' of learning design and feedback for their students. Learning tasks are the design focus, with lectures, online learning objects, etc. as topic and tool resources for creating task deliverables. - A workshop series for faculty to develop their initial online learning tasks and to think through the implications for redesigning class time for enriched interactions. The workshop includes a 'before and after' snapshot to show how the workshop itself was re-organized with online learning tasks to enhance face-to-face time. This builds on work at the University of Notre Dame by Barbara Walvoord and colleagues. - An online learning support system to embed current courseware management features within the instructional design model as an organizing framework for both faculty and students. This work in progress builds on the NLII'02 session by John Harwood and Ali Jafari, How to Solve the 'Not-Invented-Here Syndrome'. This approach is the converse of less demanding approaches to mainstream faculty, for example those focusing on 'Low Threshold Applications'. We will contrast these approaches and discuss 'what works when'. | | View this resource: | |
Faculty Roles and Rewards: Where Does Technology Fit In?
| Title: | Faculty Roles and Rewards: Where Does Technology Fit In? (ID: NLI0324) | | Author(s): | Paul R. Hagner (University of Hartford), Perry J. Samson (University of Michigan-Ann Arbor), and David Starrett (Southeast Missouri State University) | | Origin: | Presented at ELI Meetings (2003) | | Type: | Presentations/Speeches | | Abstract: | Computer technology has rushed on the scene as a significant component of the teaching and learning environment in a relatively short time. Recognition of the use of technology as a component of scholarship, teaching, and learning is a must as academia continues to move full-speed into a technology-dominated environment. It is argued that faculty development of course management systems, for example, is an inefficient use of faculty time. To the contrary, such efforts can be a superb mechanism through which faculty are encouraged to rethink their teaching strategies. Relatively few institutions have addressed this issue directly, nor has any national organization taken up the cause in a significant way. It is critical to initiate, encourage, and sustain discussion on this topic in the academy. Results of the second iteration of faculty interviews to assess their readiness to transform and to determine the impact of an institution's intervention strategies will also be discussed. | | View this resource: | |
Mapping the Learning Space
| Title: | Mapping the Learning Space (ID: NLI0309) | | Author(s): | Colleen Carmean (Arizona State University West), Flora McMartin, and Ray C. Purdom (University of North Carolina at Greensboro) | | Origin: | Presented at ELI Meetings (2003) | | Type: | Presentations/Speeches | | Abstract: | MERLOT and NLII are working collaboratively to explore and categorize emerging issues in teaching and learning online. The possibility of building a portal that guides faculty, faculty development officers, and instructional designers to rich, Web-based resources demands a new, accessible subject categorization of the field. MERLOT and NLII are now working on this mapping of topics, definitions, and materials. MERLOT's faculty development initiative, MERLOT TWO (Teaching Well Online), and NLII's research of effective learner-centered practices have created some interesting results. The panel will share these results with the audience and ask for input on refinement, next steps, and perceived bumps in the road ahead. | | View this resource: | |
|